-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 bugs buggy wrote: > On 5/8/09, Kreuvf <kre...@warzone2100.de> wrote: >> bugs buggy wrote: >> > 2.2 has been 'cooking' for a extremely long period of time. >> > Pushing beta builds to a lackluster community response, and, what is >> > worse is, people are still creating new content for 2.1, which won't >> > work with 2.2. >> >> Has there ever benn some kind of announcement/news/blog entry to make sure >> that >> people _know_ about this? Something definite, something people can rely on >> ;) > > Besides the Front page announcing the beta candidates, and the global > announcement in the forums, and the talk on the ML, then, no. And those announcements clearly state that the WRP recommends against creating new content for 2.1 as there will be no compatibility to 2.2? And ML talk is not "visible" (mind the quotation marks!) to the masses IMHO, forums is where all the action takes place.
The global announcement (http://forums.wz2100.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2950) has a misleading subject (misleading only if you want to tell people to not create new 2.1 content). And the whole topic doesn't even mention any incompatibilities with 2.1, 2.1 isn't even mentioned at all. As I cover new versions on my site as well I read all the release announcements and I cannot remember _anything_ about the attitude of the WRP towards 2.1 and new content for it. Perhaps it is a good idea to explicitly state what's up with 2.1 with the release of the next upgrade for 2.1. Actually this is a good point for releasing another upgrade for 2.1 ;) Thanks for reading, - - Kreuvf -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKBVN94y86f1GXLDwRAh4xAKDFEe6ktgT2W0iJViwbHa7oRIyiQQCfSc3a x8BAQh2qrrlVXtIskzAfhSM= =EqZY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
