On 10/10/09, Zarel <zarelxxx...@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:23 PM, bugs buggy <bugxxx...@xxxxx> wrote: > It's not so much about saving people 3 characters, as about not having > to guess when to use .wz and when not to. > > Meh, why are we even arguing this? I'm applying part of my patch, it > doesn't hurt anything, and I doubt you'd be so malicious as to revert > it.
I never said I would revert it, I just don't see a need for it. > > [...] I rather stick with 2.2.4 and so on, [...] > > Here's some more stuff on why we shouldn't release 2.2.4: while I don't really know who mordante is, let me just say this... > [14:36] <mordante> stable is bugfix only > [14:36] <mordante> as it should be (tm) > [14:37] <mordante> or you need to state your policy that every patch > release is incompatible, how often do you release patch versions The whole point of the DI routines *was* to make it _more_ stable. Right now, people would crash or have other weird behavior because we couldn't check the data before. In this sense, it IS a bugfix. It just happens to require everyone to upgrade, which is not unreasonable or bad practice IMO. > We should revert your commit to 2.2, if you don't want to release 2.3.0 yet. > Not. See above for the why. _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
