On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 13:13, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is no such thing as a WSGI 2.0 PEP and there is no proper > concensus either on what it should look like. Thus if you see anything > claiming to implement WSGI 2.0, then it isn't and you should only view > it as an experimental proposal. You are warned. :-)
Do you (or someone else) have a status on where WSGI 2 is? IIRC WSGI 1 isn't really usable with Python 3.x, so it seems about time we get something going again (AIUI this is blocking Werkzeug from being ported to 3.x, for example). Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
