Dirkjan Ochtman ha scritto: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 13:13, Graham Dumpleton > <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There is no such thing as a WSGI 2.0 PEP and there is no proper >> concensus either on what it should look like. Thus if you see anything >> claiming to implement WSGI 2.0, then it isn't and you should only view >> it as an experimental proposal. You are warned. :-) > > Do you (or someone else) have a status on where WSGI 2 is? IIRC WSGI 1 > isn't really usable with Python 3.x, so it seems about time we get > something going again (AIUI this is blocking Werkzeug from being > ported to 3.x, for example). >
WSGI 2.0 ideas are here: http://wsgi.org/wsgi/WSGI_2.0 But it does not have support for Python 3.x. Some corrections to WSGI 1.0 are here: http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Amendments_1.0 You may add support to Python 3.x in existing WSGI 1.0 implementation, but your implementation will end up to something that is no more WSGI 1.0. Manlio _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
