On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 01:35, Graham Dumpleton <graham.dumple...@gmail.com> wrote: > If that isn't done, we will be here in another year still arguing > about whether some aspect of the specification should be changed or > removed based on some individuals perceived need.
I agree, WSGI 1.1 should be more like HTML5 in that it tries to more meticulously describe/unify existing implementations. > Such a significant change as removing the requirement for write() > should also not be done within a minor version of the WSGI > specification because anything that works with WSGI 1.0 should still > work with WSGI 1.1 and vice versa. On that basis it can't really be > entertained until WSGI 2.0 where incompatible changes would be > allowed. I think it's a good idea to consider for 2.0, certainly. Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
