about your ORM remarks, Massimo already pointed out this: I prefer a more powerful tool but maybe (little) less immediate than the other way round, but I think that this is ultimately just a matter of taste.
I am not a Django expert but I used it in the past: what really got me to adopt web2py was his template language, the more pythonic I have ever seen and that's really a thing you will appreciate. About docs, you are right but web2py is improving..about admin, I do not have a deep practice with Django administration, but I have to say I never had the feeling that web2py lack something important in his admin interface. I would add that the admin web2py console where you can test your query from the command line is also a great thing you should try. carlo On 23 Ott, 20:27, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author) > > This hides the actual database implementation. It is fine is the link > table does not carry additional information but limiting otherwise. > Web2py we choose not abstract the databse too much, only the syntax to > access it, more like RoR does it. > We allow complex joins in the queries which (in my opinion) > compensates for the lack of a syntax like the one you propose). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
