LOL. The problem Tim reported, as he indicates, also exists for subsequent IE version. I am sure cherrypy chokes on that too so this is not an issue.
On Mar 11, 3:51 pm, Albert Abril <albert.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: > well we shouln't worry a lot about IE 5.5, no? 5.5!! > > let me link > this:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3609/3629069606_3d1a1cd8fb_b.jpg > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:39 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > > That is good enough. > > > Don't we all love IE? When we discover bugs in our won code we can > > think of IE and feel better about ourselves. > > > Massimo > > > On Mar 11, 3:14 pm, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > > > So I was testing with IE 5.5+. and I hit a bug uploading...but the bug > > > is in IE. It kept failing on uploading very large files and I couldn't > > > figure it out. Turns out, IE was sending this http header: > > > > Content-Length: -556031510 > > > > Oops. This is in IE 5.5 all the way to IE 8. I suspect that anything > > > over 2 GB is overflowing the signed int. > > > > Anyway I'm calling the IE family good for anything under 2GB. > > > > -tim > > > > On 3/11/2010 2:25 PM, Timothy Farrell wrote: > > > > > That was FF 3.6 on Win7. I'm going to try some less well behaved > > > > browsers (IE 5.5+ via IEtester) next. > > > > > On 3/11/2010 2:21 PM, mdipierro wrote: > > > >> Which browsers? The problem with cherrypy< 3.x was for example that > > > >> different browser treated in different ways the server delay and some > > > >> browser truncated files on download. I want to make sure that all > > > >> common browsers are tested. > > > > >> Massimo > > > > >> On Mar 11, 2:18 pm, Timothy Farrell<tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > > > >>> Slight correction: > > > > >>> db.define_table('image',Field('upload', 'upload')) > > > > >>> I have successfully up- and downloaded files as large as 480MB and > > apps > > > >>> as large as 160MB (any larger apps crashed on unzipping). In all > > cases > > > >>> I was testing over HTTPS. > > > > >>> -tim > > > > >>> On 3/11/2010 1:04 PM, mdipierro wrote: > > > > >>>> Rocket 0.3.1 is IN. Please download from trunk and start testing. > > > >>>> Use this code > > > >>>> db.define_table('image',Field('upload')) > > > >>>> Please test upload and download of a large files via appadmin into > > > >>>> "image" table. > > > >>>> Please let us know which browser you tested and whether it worked or > > > >>>> you experience any problem. > > > >>>> Massimo > > > >>>> On Mar 11, 12:24 pm, Timothy Farrell<tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> <snip> > > > >>>>>> For a production system, I'm more interested in stability than > > > >>>>>> performance. And despite the admitted arbitrariness of > > > >>>>>> version-numbering choices, it's hard to make the case to > > > >>>>>> management that moving to an 0.x server is safe. > > > >>>>>> What do *you* mean by labeling Rocket 0.x? > > > >>>>> That's a fair question. When I started, I had a certain set of > > > >>>>> features > > > >>>>> and goals that I planned to reach. Upon finishing all of those > > > >>>>> features > > > >>>>> and goal, there would be a 1.0 release. Since starting at least > > > >>>>> three > > > >>>>> of these goals have fallen by the wayside due to their > > > >>>>> improbability or > > > >>>>> lack of flexibility withing Python or the WSGI specification. > > > >>>>> In the end, I'll probably skip a few 0.x releases and go straight > > > >>>>> to 1.0 > > > >>>>> whenever I feel that there are enough of the features I originally > > > >>>>> set > > > >>>>> out to include. > > > >>>>> Like web2py, I strive to make every announced/released version > > stable > > > >>>>> enough to include in a project. I've been running web2py on > > > >>>>> different > > > >>>>> versions of Rocket for several months now. > > > >>>>> -tim > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "web2py-users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<web2py%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en.
