I did not realize that... can change it but for now it is indeed a
problem. One solution would be to extend Auth and override url()
On Oct 15, 9:07 pm, Carl <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One small problem I'm coming across...
>
> I'm using OAuth to login via LinkedIn for a subset of my users.
>
> In gluon/tools.py line 1471 the statement hard-codes 'user' (web2py 1.87.3)
> next = self.url('user',args='login',vars=dict(_next=next))
>
> Is there something I should have done to avoid this route through the code?
> I'm currently using it to pass a "return url" to LinkedIn and I'd like a
> different url besides /user/
>
> On 16 October 2010 01:01, Carl Roach <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks M
> > I'll base my agent user type on your approach
> > Thanks again for taking the time
>
> > On 16 Oct 2010, at 00:48, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > > This is what I normally do:
>
> > > 1) I use LinkedIN with RPX (but should be same with OAuth)
> > > 2) my auth_user table is populated automatically when users login via
> > > RPX
> > > 3) my auth_user table as a field "registered' invisible and defaults
> > > to false
> > > 4) my model has this code
>
> > > if auth.user and request.function!='user' and not
> > > auth.user.registered:
> > > redirect(URL('default','user/profile'))
>
> > > 5) this forces users to complete a registration process.
> > > 6) my auth_user table also a boolean manager field that defaults to
> > > false.
> > > 7) I use appadmin to promote users to managers
>
> > > On Oct 15, 6:40 pm, Carl Roach <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I've got authentication working with LinkedIn. But no registration step
> > happens... I would like to add a set of permissions the first time a new
> > user logins in via LinkedIn.
>
> > >> For a second type of user I offer a registration page to get
> > email/password and then add a different set of permissions.
>
> > >> So the piece I'm missing is: how do I fire off a registration step for
> > my "LinkedIn" users?
>
> > >> On 16 Oct 2010, at 00:19, Radomirs Cirskis <r...@nowitworks.eu> wrote:
>
> > >>> Hi Carl!
>
> > >>> you can implement two registration similar to the technique Massimo
> > >>> advised the authentication.
> > >>> You could look into CAS. Not 100% sure, but it could be solution for
> > >>> your case. I could be mistaken. Can you elaborate further on what you
> > >>> are trying to achieve?
> > >>> rad
>
> > >>> On Oct 16, 10:00 am, Carl <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> thanks M.
>
> > >>>> adding to def candidate()
> > >>>> auth.auth_user = 'candidate'
> > >>>> has that side sorted.
>
> > >>>> for my function agent() the process is a little more complicated.
> > >>>> While Candidates have to "formally" register first and then login
> > agents can
> > >>>> be "automatically" registered (I need to add some permissions and do
> > other
> > >>>> one-off stuff) when they come back from LinkedIn.
>
> > >>>> The problem is that registration doesn't take place at all and I can't
> > >>>> figure out how to get this one-off registration phase called. can you
> > point
> > >>>> me in the right direction?
>
> > >>>> On 15 October 2010 19:22, Carl <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> I'm glad I don't need two user tables. I ideally would want to stick
> > to a
> > >>>>> single table.
>
> > >>>>> On 15 October 2010 19:14, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Not necessarily and I would not do it that way but you can.
>
> > >>>>>> On Oct 15, 1:12 pm, Carl <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> thanks M.
>
> > >>>>>>> Do I understand that your solution is to have two separate user
> > tables
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>> db.py?
>
> > >>>>>>> On 15 October 2010 18:42, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu>
> > wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> look into default. You can replace
>
> > >>>>>>>> def user(): return dict(form=auth())
>
> > >>>>>>>> with
>
> > >>>>>>>> def agent(): return dict(form=auth())
> > >>>>>>>> def candidate(): return dict(form=auth())
>
> > >>>>>>>> and in the two functions you can set different default for
> > auth_user
> > >>>>>>>> fields.
>
> > >>>>>>>> On Oct 15, 8:45 am, Carl <carl.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Is there a way to use [app]/default/agent instead of
> > >>>>>> app/default/user?
>
> > >>>>>>>>> I want to have two implementations of authentication (/agent and
> > /
> > >>>>>>>>> candidate)
>
>
