The conference talk is not on web2py but I will run examples using web2py. Because of that I would like to release 1.89.1 next week. That does not prevent us from making any more changes later. Yet, I would not like to release something that is very different from the previous version and too far from definitive. It will confuse new users.
On Nov 4, 2:38 pm, Branko Vukelic <bg.bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Branko, > > > Again, thanks for all your efforts improving the Admin interface. Your > > points are well taken, and I don't think anyone expects that all of > > this feedback will be incorporated immediately (or even ever). We've > > already made some very nice improvements over the old Admin, so > > anything further is just icing on the cake. > > I've got word from Massimo that this has to be ready for the > superocmputing 2010 presentation, so I won't go into anything > intricate unless it's needed. I'll discuss with Massimo what the goals > for the conference-worthiness might be. Cleaning up the HTML will be > my primary goal, and then we'll get something done for the show. > > I've bookmarked this topic, and I'll most certainly come back to > review it once we are done with superocmputing 2010. :) > > > Note, because we don't really have any structured process in place, I > > Well, yeah. The structured process would involve using the app for a > while, and start with fixing the real problems. It's just like trying > to develop something in web2py in order to see if everything works. If > something really itches, ask for it to be scratched. If you can get > used to it, and it works, then it's probably not a problem to begin > with. And THEN we can talk about icing. > > For example, if you find yourself clicking the delete button over and > over again, then you know for sure it's in a bad location. If it just > doesn't agree with your sense of aesthetics, well, I'll make it > prettier after the conference. :) > > > think the tendency is to just chime in with any seemingly relevant > > feedback while the topic is hot (i.e., while there's an active thread > > going on the list) -- there will be no cue to do so, say, a week or a > > month from now after something is released. I suppose this could > > change, but we'd have to be more deliberate about it. > > Yes, we can think of a way, sure. Gimp guys have an UI brainstorm > site, so we could probably make something like that for web2py. > Collecting user stories (descriptions of how people use the app) would > be most welcome, too. I've asked a few questions earlier in one of the > topics, but never got a reply. > > -- > Branko Vukelić > > bg.bra...@gmail.com > stu...@brankovukelic.com > > Check out my blog:http://www.brankovukelic.com/ > Check out my portfolio:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxbunny/ > Registered Linux user #438078 (http://counter.li.org/) > I hang out on identi.ca:http://identi.ca/foxbunny > > Gimp Brushmakers Guildhttp://bit.ly/gbg-group
