Seriously: no.

I have way to many new features to add to the site and too little time to
worry about testing each time I upgrade.

--
Thadeus




On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>wrote:

> On Dec 23, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Branko Vukelić wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jonathan Lundell <jlund...@pobox.com>
> wrote:
> >> Seriously: no.
> >
> > Seriously: yes. Why? Because it's YOUR work that is going to suffer if
> > you don't. Why WOULDN'T you test something you are going to deploy?
> > I've just tested dozen frameworks and even PHP before starting a
> > project, and I'm a hobbyist. Are you telling me professional
> > developers aren't expected to make an informed choice about their
> > platform? If that's the case, "professional developers" are people I
> > would NEVER trust to do their job right.
>
> Because I'm not deploying it (the current version, that is).
>
> For the same reason we don't tell users that they *must* use Python 2.7.1,
> and re-test their 2.4-based code for compatibility: it works.
>
> Not me personally; I use the latest versions of stuff, pretty much. But I
> understand the reason for not wanting to, or at least not wanting to have
> to.
>
> >
> >> That is, if I'm using a release from six months ago, and all I need is a
> point fix,
> >
> > Then you can dig around the commits and make yourself a patch. At
> > least that's what I'd do.
>
> It's what I'd do too. But it makes web2py less friendly than it could be.

Reply via email to