I've already added this information in /book some weeks ago.

In generic views section.

http://zerp.ly/rochacbruno
Em 30/08/2011 10:21, "Massimo Di Pierro" <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> escreveu:
> Good idea. Will do that.
>
> On Aug 30, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
>
>> On the mailing list?
>>
>> One problem with mailing list is it is not a forum and it can't have a
>> Sticky feature. Information of last month is totally lost. Most busy
>> people on tight schedule wont have time to dig into pile of posts.
>>
>> So a good place to put it is on the web2py.com home page , make a
>> Notice section . Also in Download page showing that notice.
>>
>> I update from 1.96 tho .
>>
>> On 8/30/11, Massimo Di Pierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>>> We did. Over and over. We announced this starting... 1.95 ;-)
>>>
>>> On Aug 30, 2011, at 7:20 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok thats good .
>>>>
>>>> But please announce somewhere that 1.98.2 will break compatbility to
>>>> existing views those are without
>>>> response.generic_patters = ['*']
>>>>
>>>> On 8/30/11, Massimo Di Pierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote:
>>>>> This is a security measure.
>>>>> Just add this to your db.py
>>>>>
>>>>> response.generic_patters = ['*']
>>>>>
>>>>> Massimo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 30, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Phyo Arkar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> heres my call :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://localhost:8080/sExtract/extraction/listMIME.json?extracted_path=/home/v3ss/workspace-bbb/web2py-clone/applications/sExtract/static/ediscov/testFails/extracted&source_path=/home/v3ss/workspace-bbb/web2py-clone/applications/sExtract/static/ediscov/testFails/source&_search=false&nd=1314704423498&rows=100&page=1&sidx=id&sord=desc&totalrows=1000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Resulting in :
>>>>>> <html><body><h1>invalid view
>>>>>> (extraction/listMIME.json)</h1></body></html>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All other .json calls which are not with json RPC fails horribly ,
>>>>>> breaking all my applications.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> is that a bug or Feature ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This will be the last time i updating web2py blindly :(
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to