Great! It works. This is so fantastic. I love the way stuff works in web2py. Thanks Massimo.
Thanks Rahul D (www.flockbird.com - web2py powered) On Nov 29, 7:16 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > gird(,...user_sigature=fFalse) > > than do your own authentication outside the function. > > On Nov 29, 5:10 am, Rahul <rahul.dhak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > All, > > How do I view SQLForm.grid View, Edit or Delete forms without using > > auth? I have implemented my own custom authorization mechanism which > > does not use web2py auth in any way. Now the problem is in SQLForm > > grid that is serialized in my view It say "not authorised" when I > > click on View button. How do I override the default auth mechanism for > > the SQLForm grid. > > > --------code----------- > > form = SQLFORM.grid( query=query, fields=fields, headers=headers, > > orderby=default_sort_order, > > create=False, deletable=False, > > editable=False, csv=False, maxtextlength=64, paginate=20 ) > > > Please suggest, > > Thanks Rahul D (www.flockbird.com-web2py powered) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > > On Nov 22, 6:54 pm, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Massimo, the issue is that the grid doesn't provide an easy way to include > > > virtual fields. You can do it by using the 'links' argument with a > > > dictionary for each virtual field (though that's a bit cumbersome), but > > > then you cannot use the 'fields' argument to select only a subset of > > > fields > > > or the virtual fields references will fail. A workaround is to set the > > > readable attribute of fields you don't want to include to False, but > > > that's > > > even more cumbersome and results in the selecting unnecessary fields. > > > > Side note: I wonder if 'links' should be changed to a more generic name, > > > such as 'extra', since it can be used to add extra columns of any type, > > > not > > > just links. > > > > Anthony > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2011 9:58:18 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > > > I am bit lost in this thread. Can you summarize the issue? > > > > > On Nov 21, 7:55 pm, villas <vill...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Yes, that's a good idea and it does seem to work. > > > > > On the downside, I have a huge number of fields and I think the query > > > > will > > > > > still fetch them all. Also I have to make a very long list of > > > > > field.readable = False. > > > > > So, if a better solution appears, I would be very grateful. > > > > > However, in any case, I really do appreciate your assistance. > > > > > Thank you and best regards, David
