+1 for git. It seems so much simpler.
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:32:14 AM UTC-4, Bruce Wade wrote: > > I second this idea and would be interested in helping. However I want to > get git integration more then HG :D > > Thinking we should also have a feature request built into this, because > the CEO constantly asks for new features without realizing we already have > 100 open features we are still coding. > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Jason Brower <encomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have noticed one other tracker in web2py, but I couldn't demo it. >> Besides that it is cloning, and I wonder if I could just start from scratch >> with a few features. >> One in particular is integrating with web2py a bit. >> For example, seeing tickets for a particular app and binding the ticket >> to a new bug. Or integration with Hg to close bugs with commits. >> The reason I want to build one in web2py is because I don't want to have >> to setup a special environment just for my tracker. I want to use similar >> deployment recipes to save time. The bonuses could be the integration into >> web2py and hg. >> Other things that might be nice is integration with reported issues from >> customers/users. It would provide a bug reporting interface that is access >> from clicking on the ticket when not connected locally accessing it. >> BR, >> Jason >> >> > > > -- > -- > Regards, > Bruce Wade > http://ca.linkedin.com/in/brucelwade > http://www.wadecybertech.com > http://www.fittraineronline.com - Fitness Personal Trainers Online > http://www.warplydesigned.com > >
