On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:21:36 -0700 (PDT) "Arthur P." <a.p.mein...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having installed my first CMS using Joomla, my albums using Gallery2, > and having more recently used Drupal, I think most if not all Python > based CMS's are still very much "programmer's products", have not yet > reached the plug and play level of Joomla. Web2Py as framework > certainly seems the easiest to install and to get something up and > running with, but I have the feeling I will have to do a bit more > reading than with Joomla... I agree that Web2py is still very much "programmer's product" and that's why I still stay with Concrete5 (PHP). Otoh, there are several mature Django-based CMS-es (Django-CMS, Mezzanine, FeinCMS...) which are approaching PHP ones in terms of ease of use for end user, add-ons etc. However, we still hope that some robust web2py-based CMS will evolve in due course of time not requiring to write most of the stuff from the scratch. Sincerely, Gour -- Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor all these kings; nor in the future shall any of us cease to be. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
