I should clarify that although Blink is very interested in implementing more of the DOM in JS, we haven't actually shipped any of that yet: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/d/13cT9Klgvt_ciAR3ONGvzKvw6fz9-f6E0FrqYFqfoc8Y/edit#
We have to prove that it works (and can be made safe) first. :) On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:17 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: >>> What I'm saying is that we can implement it in JavaScriptCore for >>> performance and we still make it look like a regular DOM object with >>> wrappers to preserve the semantics. >> >> I understand that, but given that it is in the JavaScript engine at >> that point, they cannot realistically standardize on a different >> abstraction later on. And I got the impression typed arrays caught >> them off guard, so giving them a heads up this time around might be >> good. > > Blink is slowly moving the DOM into the JS engine. That doesn't make the DOM > part of ECMAScript or needs approval of TC39. I do not think that typed > arrays can be compared to DOMPoint or DOMMatrix. But DOMPoint to the plans of > implementing DOM in JSC. > > I am interested in implementing the geometry interfaces into JSC. I wonder if > we could generate the code from IDL as well. I do not think that this is > possible with our code generators today. Is it? > > Greetings > Dirk > >> >> >> -- >> http://annevankesteren.nl/ >> _______________________________________________ >> webkit-dev mailing list >> webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org >> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev > _______________________________________________ > webkit-dev mailing list > webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
