On Aug 21, 2006, at 8:02 PM, Marc Oesch wrote:

I'm all for for more WO source code and building blocks for generic
funtionality as  Arturo suggested, but this may take some months.

We could always gradually switch over as more and more tools become
available written in WebObjects.


Yes, of course.  I didn't mean that we should build Wikis etc to use for
the WebObjects Foundation.  I meantmindshare is created by providing
working solutions.

Apache became a powerhouse because they built/supported a fully functional HTTP server that had all the bells and whistles necessary. Ditto for Struts,
Hibernate, etc.

Talking about how WOnderful WO is will buy us nothing (or, like the old joke, that and 5 bucks will get you a Starbucks). Showing how WOnderful WO is with
working applications will do the trick.

-arturo

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to