On 22 Aug 2006, at 10:04, Yann Bizeul wrote:
My advice is that if we don't use WO to host the web site, we can
use anything completely unrelated to WO, choosing a solution based
on administration simplicity and accessibility, no matter it is a
step backward technologicaly speaking.
The accessibility issue reminds me of this:
«First, make sure that you use a supported browser. We support
Firefox (on all platforms) and IE on Windows.(*) [...] (*) Safari on
the Mac works for most tasks (the rich text editor is not working
with Safari). Camino is working even better.»
-- http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/about-magnolia/demo.html
Personnaly, I think we should run a basic solution using WO that
will growth with the time to include modules people think are
necessary, progressively.
I wholeheartedly agree.
As a starting point, a simple WO application with news engine and
basic CMS features (projects repository with a link to the file,
homepage, and descriptive text with categorization should be
sufficient).
That would force us to collaborate from the very beginning (while
better avoiding the trap of reproducing WO resource sites already
available).
I say we use Wonder 3 heavily for this (and document it as we use it).
I agree the whole thing should be opensource
Like Pier and unlike Magnolia, which is a just a typical bait
"Community Edition" ;)
Cheers
--mbj
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to archive@mail-archive.com
