Oh. a cron-based DB dump for sure, but then those dumps are versioned by time machine to at least another volume.
On 10/29/07, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Especially check out the discussions about the bugs with Aperture and > its corruption when it writes during Time Machine backups -- It may > apply. I would definitely lean towards using a proper db dump for > backups instead. > > ms > > On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > On 2007/10/29, at 22:48, Joe Little wrote: > > > >> Loved these instructions. I may just go ahead and move one of our > >> servers to 10.5 along with this (already worked great on my laptop) > >> just so I can keep WO 5.3 _and_ get the benefits of TimeMachine for > >> backing up my databases. > > > > Be careful with that... backing-up live DBs just by coping files is > > a path to disaster, unless you are using some kind of WAL... > > > > Yours > > > > Miguel Arroz > > > > Miguel Arroz > > http://www.terminalapp.net > > http://www.ipragma.com > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jmlittle%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
