Ah I'm w/ you now ... ok.
ms
On Oct 29, 2007, at 9:20 PM, Joe Little wrote:
Oh. a cron-based DB dump for sure, but then those dumps are versioned
by time machine to at least another volume.
On 10/29/07, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Especially check out the discussions about the bugs with Aperture and
its corruption when it writes during Time Machine backups -- It may
apply. I would definitely lean towards using a proper db dump for
backups instead.
ms
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:21 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
On 2007/10/29, at 22:48, Joe Little wrote:
Loved these instructions. I may just go ahead and move one of our
servers to 10.5 along with this (already worked great on my laptop)
just so I can keep WO 5.3 _and_ get the benefits of TimeMachine for
backing up my databases.
Be careful with that... backing-up live DBs just by coping files is
a path to disaster, unless you are using some kind of WAL...
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jmlittle%40gmail.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
