Paolo,
I see why you like a more dynamic approach. Dynamic is good, and it
should not be very difficult to make a visual editor for your XML.
Since I have never extensively used EOAssociation classes, and have
after some initial work with it skipped Apple's JC stuff in total
(except when used for data distribution) I do not have a very clear
picture of what kind of results you are getting.
Anyway, once the library I am working on is done, it will be
accompanied with tutorials, docs, and (hopefully) a demonstration app
with source code, so you'll be able to see if you like that approach,
and can use what's best for you.
My best,
Flor
On Nov 08, 2007, at 15:33, Paolo Sommaruga wrote:
Hi Florijan,
it's because the core jc stuff still stays that I think It's
reasonable to continue to use in the jc application EODisplayGroup,
EOAssociation, etc. I think the status is like as the web WO where
the core stuff stays but WebObjects Builder is lacking. In the jc
client development the core stuff largely stays but now Interface
Builder is lacking. Doubtless in my xml binding approach, to edit
by hands a xml file is'nt fun as to play with Interface Builder but
it's much better that to hardcode in the gui java class all the
EODisplayGroup, EOAssociation code. The gui java class remain a
pure swing class, the needed EODisplayGroup, EOAssociation, etc.
stuff are "automagically" added following the binding described in
the xml file. One have to extends the gui class as EOApplication
but this requiremet is just only to start the application, in order
to do the applicationClassName binding in JavaClient.wo working, as
you has described in your WebObjects Java Client tutorial.
Furthermore, in the future one can creates a visually tool, an
eclipse plugin or other, which can generate the xml file
Regards
Paolo
Il giorno 08/nov/07, alle ore 03:05, Florijan Stamenkovic ha scritto:
Thanks to all, and apologies as well, last time I checked (a few
days ago) I was unable to locate the 5.4 API online, possibly to
my own stupidity.
My best,
Flor
On Nov 07, 2007, at 14:09, Mike Schrag wrote:
Could we stop the speculation and look at the facts. The
documentation is here:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/
WO54_Reference/
.. and also
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSXServer/Reference/
WO54_Reference/deprecated-list.html
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/flor385%
40mac.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/psomma%
40jpaso.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
