On 10/10/2009, at 10:28 AM, Ravi Mendis wrote:

On Friday, October 09, 2009, at 07:11PM, Joe Little <[email protected] > wrote:
LiftWeb is painful to the eyes. Scala is great, LiftWeb just won't
gain traction with my brain.

I couldn't agree more:
I love Scala, but it's a shame about Lift...

If you're looking for alternatives or just something new, try Scala with WebObjects instead.

This should get you started:
http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WO/WebObjects+with +Scala

IMHO Scala is to Java what Objective-C was to C.
My first impressions of Scala is akin to what i felt about Objective- C when i first discovered it 15 yrs ago...

interesting...

For most developers i suspect that a sore-point of using WebObjects nowadays is...Java.
So maybe you need to look at Java-alternatives not WO-alternatives :)

Yeah, Java is certainly one point of consideration for its lack of dynamism. Certainly utilising Groovy or Scala could help here.

But honestly I believe the major sore point (if there be one amongst the surveys) is the waiting for news about 5.5 and/or 5.6's arrival (which is all probably under NDA for you guys who were at WOWODC) ... and for that matter Giandiua ;).

with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to