Le 2013-02-07 à 13:50, Ramsey Gurley <rgur...@smarthealth.com> a écrit :

> 
> On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> 
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> Based on the feedback we have so far in the surveys (if you haven't answered 
>> the 2013 surveys, please do it in the next 7 days), we established a list of 
>> goals for 2013:
>> 
>> - We need a jQuery framework. According to the surveys, members of the 
>> community use jQuery almost as much as the Ajax framework from Wonder. In 
>> fact, I'm wondering how you use it now, in Direct Actions? Just for effects? 
>> If you already have a jQuery framework that you would like to give to the 
>> community, we can work it out.
> 
> 
> We have a couple of these already. What's missing?

That's the good question. Lot of people using jQuery, but I don't see any 
framework beside ERJQueryMobile.

> 
>> - Better integration between WO and iOS (and Android). ERSync is a start, 
>> and I was thinking maybe we could make a tool that reads a CoreData model, 
>> convert it to a EOModel and automatically build REST services for the model. 
> 
> 
> I read this as Java Client for mobile.

I don't think you like this idea :-P

> 
> 
>> - A "Project Wonder Cookbook". That book would contains, two pages max, 
>> solutions to common problems and questions about Project Wonder.
> 
> 
> I often observe that the biggest problem WO devs have isn't solving a problem 
> with WO/Wonder. Instead, I see is WO devs reinventing wheels. Writing 
> solutions for problems already covered by WO/Wonder. 
> 
> The frameworks are so big, people just don't realize what's in there and come 
> up with one off solutions that aren't as robust in the end. 
> 
> Maybe we should have some WOCommunity highlights or something. A monthly 
> "Hey, check out this {framework | component | class}. Did you know ...?" sort 
> of thing. Validation is one of these things. WO offers validation. Wonder 
> improves it greatly. Everyone seems to make up their own anyway.

+100.

> 
>> - Getting more people to understand and work on WOLips.
> 
> 
> That'll be tough. Q is our lifeline right now. Without him, I don't think 
> anyone would have updated WOLips for 4.2.
> 
> 
>> - A easy-to-install development environment, that would install not only 
>> WOLips and Eclipse, but also the core WO frameworks and Project Wonder.
> 
> 
> I've given up on this happening. There's too much to do for an installer and 
> its painful work without any direct benefit for the author who would need to 
> provide ongoing maintenance and support.  It would need to install:
> 
> Eclipse
> WOLips
> eGit/git
> jadclipse
> WebObjects
> clone and import Wonder
> Set up the wolips.properties
> Apache
> mod_webobjects
> 
> And lots of these pieces update independently of the others. The getting 
> started guide on the wiki is pretty good. It just needs to include the apache 
> setup.  I had a guy showing interest in WO here at work and he gave up at 
> Apache. I'm hoping he will get a second wind.

Well, I guess less people bugs you about development tools and deployment than 
me :-) Yes, I do have less questions about development tools once the new wiki 
page was up, but it's still a pain for some people. But I must say that the #1 
problem is: the incremental builder vs Ant.

I still think that we need that WOLips ships as a Eclipse RCP app, just like 
most other IDEs based on Eclipse.

>> - A easy to use deployment service. Having helped many people with 
>> deployment issues, it looks like deployment is still an issue. 
> 
> 
> The linux stuff you are working on sounds promising. I haven't had a chance 
> to try them out yet, but it would be nice to be able to stay up to date on 
> java monitor and wotaskd with a package manager.

+1. And the OS X development package should be a .pkg so that it can be 
integrated in a workflow like ARD or other tools.

>> - Redesign of wocommunity.org. 
> 
> 
> I think wocommunity.org does the job just fine as is. What are you wanting to 
> redesign?

It's so 2008. I see lots of comments on Twitter about how WO is outdated, etc., 
and I don't think it helps that our site looks old too.

> 
>> - Looking at how we can replace parts of WO with open source parts. The 
>> Cayenne training day at WOWODC 2013 is the first step toward that goal.
> 
> 
> Keeping my comments to myself :-)
> 
> 
>> How are we going to finance this? We will change how the membership works. 
>> We will have the following options:
>> 
>> - $50 for regular membership. This $50 will be for paying recurrent charges, 
>> like the hosting fees for wocommunity.org, and to pay for deposits related 
>> to WOWODC. You still get early access to WOWODC recordings.
>> 
>> - $300 for Bronze Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on 
>> wocommunity.org for 6 months (on rotation with other sponsors).
>> 
>> - $750 for Silver Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on 
>> wocommunity.org for 12 months (on rotation with other sponsors) and your 
>> logo on the WOWODC site.
>> 
>> - $1500 for Gold Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on 
>> wocommunity.org for 12 months (no rotation) and your logo on the WOWODC 
>> site. You also get one WOWODC 2013 ticket.
> 
> 
> A nice flyer or something I could hand to/forward to my boss would be good 
> here. We are suffering a shortage of WO devs currently, so maybe pitch it as 
> a way to get more exposure with developers might help. As someone else 
> mentioned, it would be even better if it were tax deductible and mentioned 
> that specifically.

About the lack of WO devs, we need to pass the word that:

1) WO is not so outdated, especially with Wonder
2) Need current documentation and tutorials
3) Need a easy-to-deploy solution
4) Need to get iOS devs to use Wonder

> 
>> 
>> For bigger tasks, like the jQuery framework and the Project Wonder Cookbook, 
>> we will use Kickstarter or a similar system to raise money to do it, and if 
>> we don't raise enough cash, the project simply dies.
>> 
>> Comments about this?
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
>> 
>> This email sent to rgur...@smarthealth.com
> 


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to