Le 2013-02-07 à 13:50, Ramsey Gurley <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On Feb 7, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Based on the feedback we have so far in the surveys (if you haven't answered
>> the 2013 surveys, please do it in the next 7 days), we established a list of
>> goals for 2013:
>>
>> - We need a jQuery framework. According to the surveys, members of the
>> community use jQuery almost as much as the Ajax framework from Wonder. In
>> fact, I'm wondering how you use it now, in Direct Actions? Just for effects?
>> If you already have a jQuery framework that you would like to give to the
>> community, we can work it out.
>
>
> We have a couple of these already. What's missing?
That's the good question. Lot of people using jQuery, but I don't see any
framework beside ERJQueryMobile.
>
>> - Better integration between WO and iOS (and Android). ERSync is a start,
>> and I was thinking maybe we could make a tool that reads a CoreData model,
>> convert it to a EOModel and automatically build REST services for the model.
>
>
> I read this as Java Client for mobile.
I don't think you like this idea :-P
>
>
>> - A "Project Wonder Cookbook". That book would contains, two pages max,
>> solutions to common problems and questions about Project Wonder.
>
>
> I often observe that the biggest problem WO devs have isn't solving a problem
> with WO/Wonder. Instead, I see is WO devs reinventing wheels. Writing
> solutions for problems already covered by WO/Wonder.
>
> The frameworks are so big, people just don't realize what's in there and come
> up with one off solutions that aren't as robust in the end.
>
> Maybe we should have some WOCommunity highlights or something. A monthly
> "Hey, check out this {framework | component | class}. Did you know ...?" sort
> of thing. Validation is one of these things. WO offers validation. Wonder
> improves it greatly. Everyone seems to make up their own anyway.
+100.
>
>> - Getting more people to understand and work on WOLips.
>
>
> That'll be tough. Q is our lifeline right now. Without him, I don't think
> anyone would have updated WOLips for 4.2.
>
>
>> - A easy-to-install development environment, that would install not only
>> WOLips and Eclipse, but also the core WO frameworks and Project Wonder.
>
>
> I've given up on this happening. There's too much to do for an installer and
> its painful work without any direct benefit for the author who would need to
> provide ongoing maintenance and support. It would need to install:
>
> Eclipse
> WOLips
> eGit/git
> jadclipse
> WebObjects
> clone and import Wonder
> Set up the wolips.properties
> Apache
> mod_webobjects
>
> And lots of these pieces update independently of the others. The getting
> started guide on the wiki is pretty good. It just needs to include the apache
> setup. I had a guy showing interest in WO here at work and he gave up at
> Apache. I'm hoping he will get a second wind.
Well, I guess less people bugs you about development tools and deployment than
me :-) Yes, I do have less questions about development tools once the new wiki
page was up, but it's still a pain for some people. But I must say that the #1
problem is: the incremental builder vs Ant.
I still think that we need that WOLips ships as a Eclipse RCP app, just like
most other IDEs based on Eclipse.
>> - A easy to use deployment service. Having helped many people with
>> deployment issues, it looks like deployment is still an issue.
>
>
> The linux stuff you are working on sounds promising. I haven't had a chance
> to try them out yet, but it would be nice to be able to stay up to date on
> java monitor and wotaskd with a package manager.
+1. And the OS X development package should be a .pkg so that it can be
integrated in a workflow like ARD or other tools.
>> - Redesign of wocommunity.org.
>
>
> I think wocommunity.org does the job just fine as is. What are you wanting to
> redesign?
It's so 2008. I see lots of comments on Twitter about how WO is outdated, etc.,
and I don't think it helps that our site looks old too.
>
>> - Looking at how we can replace parts of WO with open source parts. The
>> Cayenne training day at WOWODC 2013 is the first step toward that goal.
>
>
> Keeping my comments to myself :-)
>
>
>> How are we going to finance this? We will change how the membership works.
>> We will have the following options:
>>
>> - $50 for regular membership. This $50 will be for paying recurrent charges,
>> like the hosting fees for wocommunity.org, and to pay for deposits related
>> to WOWODC. You still get early access to WOWODC recordings.
>>
>> - $300 for Bronze Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on
>> wocommunity.org for 6 months (on rotation with other sponsors).
>>
>> - $750 for Silver Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on
>> wocommunity.org for 12 months (on rotation with other sponsors) and your
>> logo on the WOWODC site.
>>
>> - $1500 for Gold Sponsorship. You get membership + your company logo on
>> wocommunity.org for 12 months (no rotation) and your logo on the WOWODC
>> site. You also get one WOWODC 2013 ticket.
>
>
> A nice flyer or something I could hand to/forward to my boss would be good
> here. We are suffering a shortage of WO devs currently, so maybe pitch it as
> a way to get more exposure with developers might help. As someone else
> mentioned, it would be even better if it were tax deductible and mentioned
> that specifically.
About the lack of WO devs, we need to pass the word that:
1) WO is not so outdated, especially with Wonder
2) Need current documentation and tutorials
3) Need a easy-to-deploy solution
4) Need to get iOS devs to use Wonder
>
>>
>> For bigger tasks, like the jQuery framework and the Project Wonder Cookbook,
>> we will use Kickstarter or a similar system to raise money to do it, and if
>> we don't raise enough cash, the project simply dies.
>>
>> Comments about this?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/rgurley%40smarthealth.com
>>
>> This email sent to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]