+1 Jérémy
> Le 12 mai 2016 à 16:38, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> a écrit : > > I feel rather bad and somewhat responsible for everything that’s going on > these days. I had no idea that a phonecall from Apple would result in this. > > I'm still using WO actively in numerous old and new projects, and I don’t see > that changing anytime soon. Being an opensource nut I’ve made numerous > attempts at “escaping” WO, but that sweet, sweet statefulness, lovely API, > KVC and WOLips just keeps dragging me back in. > > We need to find a way forward. > > - hugi > > > >> On 12. maí 2016, at 14:14, Michael Kondratov <mich...@aspireauctions.com> >> wrote: >> >> Pascal, >> There are also people like us that use WO for internal projects. I have >> not been able to find any other platform that would warrant a move. It was >> pretty clear to me that Apple discontinued WO good 15 years ago. Is it >> really possible that only 50 people or so in the world that still use >> WebObjects? Is there something that is better? (Or 99.999999..% use inferior >> tools?) >> >> Michael >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On May 12, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote: >>> >>> It seems the majority wants to keep the WOCommunity server alive until >>> WOWODC, so let's do that. >>> >>> Now, the reasons of why I wanted to shutdown everything: >>> >>> - The results of the surveys are not positive. Only 57% of respondents use >>> WO for new and current projects, 32% only for maintenance, the rest is >>> moving away or already done so. >>> >>> - Based on this, I expect to lose 10-12 WOWODC guests, so I calculated that >>> we needed 45 guests and made the arrangements based on that number. Sadly, >>> we are only 33 so far, and usually at that timeframe, we only get 4-5 >>> registrations. Hence the 6200$ deficit (now reduced to about 2100$). >>> >>> - Contributions to Wonder is next to nothing for the last year. >>> >>> - I was thinking that having a session about using Cayenne with WO would be >>> a great way to modernize WO, and hence generate interest, and looks like I >>> was wrong, or else we would have more people at WOWODC, not less. >>> >>> - At WOWODC 2014, we asked if people were using the master branch of >>> Wonder, and the vast majority said they are using their own fork. So why >>> should we keep Jenkins if most of you use their own forks? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/michael%40aspireauctions.com >>> >>> This email sent to mich...@aspireauctions.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/hugi%40karlmenn.is >> >> This email sent to h...@karlmenn.is > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/jeremy.deroyer%40ingencys.net > > This email sent to jeremy.dero...@ingencys.net _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
