Hi, All our new ui improvments are based on jQuery (more without than with bootstrap) that’s why I’m looking for a new lighter way, as Google is more and more attentive to the speed of websites.
Yesterday, I tried to rewrite AjaxModalDialog using both AjaxUpdateContainer and jQuery ui dialog in order to reduce the subset of ajax components we use. So far it work’s well and the users are saying it’s faster. Maybe it’s a way to follow to gently migrate... Jérémy Le 30 oct. 2019 à 01:28, Paul Hoadley <pa...@logicsquad.net<mailto:pa...@logicsquad.net>> a écrit : Hi Jérémy, On 29 Oct 2019, at 17:48, Jérémy DE ROYER via Webobjects-dev <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com<mailto:webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com>> wrote: To deal with ajax-back-end-requests, we currently use : - AjaxModaDialog - AjaxUpdateContainer - AjaxUpdateLink - AjaxObserveField - AjaxSubmitButton - AjaxLongResponse How do you deal with Ajax ? Still use wonder with prototype ? Any new idea ? We use a slightly different subset of components from Ajax.framework, probably more like this: * AjaxUpdateContainer * AjaxUpdateLink * AjaxSubmitButton * AjaxFlickrBatchNavigation * AjaxObserveField We then use a bit of jQuery, and so always call jQuery.noConflict(). Some projects require a workaround to play nicely with Bootstrap. So we're using quite a limited subset of components, and no D2W, but we do mix in jQuery and sometimes Bootstrap. I can't recall the last time we hit an issue that couldn't be solved or worked around. -- Paul Hoadley https://logicsquad.net/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
