* Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: >I have implemented Base64 from scratch many times. It takes about 30 >lines. If that is too hard it is easy enough to swap the characters >over. > >Base 256 would use a whole rack of characters that are illegal in URIs. > >Isn't the alleged point of free software that it is easy to add in features?
You started this thread saying "it would be better if we had a single format". How about you abandon this idea, you call your scheme "d64:" to keep things concise, and the rest of us develop our own format? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjo...@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
