Hi, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Mark Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 30 december 2004 17:02
<snap> > The difference may be approached with the question of "what > is a programming language?". This may seem fundamental but > there is, imho, a tendency to consider templates and such as > programming languages when they merely script. <snap> > In this context, DTML may be seen as more complicated that it > needs to be. And there is the notion that building a > "framework" upon a framework is redundant. This is a very interesting point you make, very familiar to our experience with (and many internal discussions on how to apply!) DTML. We now try to avoid the more complex features if their implementation in python doesn't result in hard coded HTML fragment strings : in our opinion / taste , all data processing belongs in the python code if possible, and result data should be passed to DTML in an 'optimally elegant', i.e. fully normalized, data structure. > More to the point, > the elegance of a solution lies in the efficiency of the > framework, the velocity a team can attain and the resilience > of the architecture to the inevitable change in requirements. Hear hear, and a happy new year to you too ! -- Thijs Phaedro ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
