Uh man, you seem pretty pasionate on this. I'll just lay off it. Sorry man. Its just an impression and my gut vibe. Not something I care to dig too deeply in.
> Hi, > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: Shayne ONeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Verzonden: donderdag 30 december 2004 7:10 > > > No. I can plainly say that personally the mess that is DTML > > is precidely why I quit using zope (and havent looked back). > > > > Please allow me to remain stubborn in my support of DTML : I have developed, > with my team, multiple web apps using DTML and yes, every > language/technology has its pros and cons, but talk of "the mess that is > DTML" just isn't coherent (at all) with our experiences ... > > Now, "the mess that is DTML" is also an absolute statement; my question then > is: 'a mess compared to what'? Do you think it is messier than, say, PHP > smarty templates ? Or messier than the rather hardcoded > 'self.writeln("<p>%s</p>" % (string))' statements in some of the WebKit > examples ? > > But, much more interesting and I would like to ask this to the other > apparant DTML criticist Ian as well: what do you use for templating (PSP , > ZPT , sthg. else?) ? Though stubborn in my support, I haven't said that > other technologies less familiar to me are inferior per se - on the > contrary! - so I would much appreciate tips to upgrade our apparant 'DTML > legacy' in coming projects ! > > > Yours, > > > > Thijs Cobben > > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
