The idea (maybe naïve) was to allow map designers to move map closer to the front line without breaking the balance by making village grabbing less of a decisive move (giving an opponent a chance to mitigate dammage) in such a way that villages that are further away from the frontline are not affected (if no fight takes place the behaviour isn't changed)
I don't think it favors defensive players much since most fighting takes place further of villages (because villages close to disputed areas tend to prevent balance in current game) On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 9:22 PM, George B <all.out.of....@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I would like to see attacking get somewhat easier (I.E. more > situations where attacking is a good thing) in multiplayer - specifically > 1v1 games. I tend to think that anything that makes attacking harder (which > this does, if only slightly) needs to have a clear benefit to gameplay. I > am not sure that this is a clear improvement? And it would make attacking > slightly harder. As such, I am slightly against it. Not because it is a > bad idea, per se, but because I would like to see the attacker be the one to > be favored in more of these minor changes. > George aka Wintermute aka happygrue > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:54 AM, jeremy rosen > <jeremy.ro...@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Guillaume Melquiond >> <guillaume.melqui...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 2010/2/28, Jeremy Rosen wrote >> > >> >> this has the following consequences >> >> * A's unit has to survive its opponent's turns in order to own the >> >> village >> >> * However if A grabs a village, it's removed from the other team's >> >> ressource immediately, this is not really an extra turn to save your >> >> village. >> >> >> >> I plan to add it to EasyCoding or NotSoEasyCoding if nobody voices a >> >> protest >> > >> > Please don't. Adding something to EasyCoding while it won't be >> > accepted later (due to it being a gameplay change) is just terrible >> > for the one implementing it. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > Guillaume >> >> I would not have added it there until the principle is accepted here >> (just to clarify) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wesnoth-dev mailing list >> Wesnoth-dev@gna.org >> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > > > > -- > The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy. > > "With your head full of brains and your shoes full of feet, you're too smart > to go down any not so good street." - D.S. > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > Wesnoth-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > > _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
