On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Nils Kneuper <crazy-ivano...@gmx.net> wrote:
> There was a lot more work involved than getting the repo converted to git. > Esr > also fixed many references in our documentation (the stuff in the repo as > well > as in the git) which really should get lots of cudos. And I understand > that it > is frustrating to feel that you have spent a freaking huge amount of time > and > then hear "yeah, what you have done was okay but not good enough as real > and > final solution". > The problem here is the timing of *when* the retry of github took place and > how this was communicated (or not communicated early on as "I will try to > sweettalk them into allowing us anyway"). > This is fair, and I take responsibility and apologize to esr and anyone else involved in the move for lost work and irritation. This should have been handled better. David
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
