On 4/12/12 12:11 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Hmm. That, as phrased, is pretty complicated to implement in a performant way, if the two methods/getters/setters have the same signatures...
Since I'm not terribly familiar with our generated bindings code, I'm not really sure what that would be. Is there a phrasing that would not be so complicated but does the same thing? :)