DOH! - that hurts ;) no serious: for java-webframeworks there is no standard yet - at least no finished (JSP is dead & mess, JSF is not yet finished and usable and struts... well, split up into different projects)
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Igor Vaynberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 6. November 2006 00:09 > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: [VOTE] Nested forms - don't process inner > form fields in outer form submit > > On 11/5/06, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > shame on me ... > > > > my personal way is to always stick to standards - it might > be harder > > sometimes to achive this, but youre on a save side... > > > you contradict yourself by using wicket :P > > -igor > > > > Regards > > > > Korbinian > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. November 2006 22:00 > > > An: wicket-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > Betreff: Re: Re: [VOTE] Nested forms - don't process inner form > > > fields in outer form submit > > > > > > On 11/5/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The vote: don't process inner form fields when the > outer form is > > > > > submitted [ ] Yes, don't process those pesky little > > > fields [ ] No, > > > > > process them as if they were part of the outer form > > > > > > > > I'm still not crazy about the whole concept, but I guess > > > nested forms > > > > can be useful sometimes. I just hope we don't open up > > > another can of > > > > worms. > > > > > > Hmmm.... breakfast. We already allow nested forms, but we > don't do > > > anything about it, and these fail horribly at the moment as > > > Korbinian reminds us of constantly. The only other option > would be > > > to check the markup and throw a runtime exception that nesting is > > > not allowed. > > > > > > I think the way we treat nested forms in 2.0 and 1.3 a real > > > improvement and a showcase for component frameworks: work around > > > problems in an elegant and meaningful way. Abstract away the > > > limitations of the protocols we have to work with. > > > > > > > My vote: > > > > [ x ] Yes, don't process those pesky little fields > > > > > > > > as that is more explicit/ less magic. > > > > > > Thanks for the vote. > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > <a > > > > href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a > > > > > > > for <a > > > > href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a> > > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best > > > Stuff in the World!</a> > > > > > > > >