just making sure you knew about it to save you some work :)
-igor On 11/6/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't like the patch. It only merged MockWebApplication and WebTester into a single big class. The author assumed it works, but as the patch didn't include the modification necessary to the existing junit test cases, ... Juergen On 11/6/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > didnt someone already submit a patch that does this? > > -igor > > > On 11/6/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Currently MockWebApplication and WicketTester are derived from > > WebApplication which requires us to copy & paste code from > > MyApplication to MyWicketTester which is kind of ugly. I changed > > MockWebApplication to delegate to an application instead. It seems to > > work fine but most xxxExpectedResult.html files must be changed. > > Example > > > > <a > > href="/WicketTester/WicketTester?wicket:interface=:0:link::ILinkListener" > > wicket:id="link">test</a> > > --- > > <a > > href="/DummyApplication/DummyApplication?wicket:interface=:0:link::ILinkListener" > > wicket:id="link">test</a> > > > > I guess that is ok, but I want to check with you first. Any thought? > > > > Juergen > > > >
