"Highly rated" is an interesting property. One of the ways that a publication venue becomes highly rated is by being highly restrictive. In fact, the primary measurement of the quality of a publication venue is the acceptance rate of that conference.
WikiSym is not considered highly rated because a high proportion of the submitted papers are accepted. Would a wiki journal be more restrictive in order to gain a "highly rated" status? I think it's interesting to ask why WikiSym needs improvement and why attendance has been falling. If a WikiSym is a wiki conference that is struggling to maintain participation, how might a wiki journal surmount such trouble? Assuming that the answer to my question above is "yes, the wiki-journal would be more restrictive", how would such a journal gather more submissions than an established conference like WikiSym -- enough to both produce regular issues and maintain a high rejection rate? -Aaron On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Joe Corneli <holtzerman...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aaron Halfaker <aaron.halfa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > To state it plainly, why do we need yet another publication venue > specific to wiki software? > > I think people want a "highly rated" publication venue. Also, > > «The reason why WikiSym is changing is for the same reason. People are > not going to the conference! I think the attendance has been below > 100 for some time now. That's not a sustainable number for the amount > of work that goes into organizing a conference.» > > But what you're saying suggests that maybe work should be done to > improve existing venues rather than creating a new one. > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
