I am thinking maybe we could use subdomains for layperson, and for schools,
and maybe universities to have specialized [approved] content also ? Just
an idea given this possible mechanism.

On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 20:15, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you please keep suggestions and pragmatics coming in !
>
> I looked at this problem some time ago and the extra programming for what
> I am proposing is quite minimal utilizing existing MediaWiki libraries and
> adding extra code to support the tag structure with defaulting to make it
> seamless to existing articles.
>
> I really think this would increase the usability and audience of
> Wikipedia and also might possibly allow us to integrate content from other
> Wikipedia projects.
>
> Regards,
>
> Aaron
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 at 07:57, Amir E. Aharoni <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il>
> wrote:
>
>> The suggestions that bring up the Simple English Wikipedia miss the fact
>> that it only covers the English language, which most people don't know,
>> and
>> doesn't do almost anything for the many other languages of the world. (I'm
>> saying "almost anything" because I know that there are people who prefer
>> to
>> translate articles from the Simple English Wikipedia, and this indirectly
>> benefits other languages.)
>>
>> One thing about how Wikipedia works that practically no-one ever
>> challenges
>> is that every page title is associated with a page, and the page is always
>> a single big blob of sections, section headings, templates and magic
>> words.
>>
>> What if it was not a single blob?
>>
>> What if all the magic words, such as NOTOC, DISPLAYTITLE, and DEFAULTSORT
>> moved to a separate metadata storage?
>>
>> More closely to this thread's topic, what if at least some sections that
>> all or most pages have were stored separately, so that it would be
>> possible
>> to parse and render them semantically? The References section, for
>> example,
>> is something that many pages have. What if it could be separated from the
>> prose blob and stored separately, so that it would be parsed semantically
>> for different screens and contexts, such as Wikicite? Currently its
>> rendering and storage is heavily biased for desktop and wiki syntax
>> editing, and suboptimal for mobile display and editing, as well as for
>> translation.
>>
>> And most closely to the thread's original topic, what if one page could
>> have several lead sections? Sure, this can be done now with hacks such as
>> templates and namespaces, but these are still hacks: they are not
>> semantic,
>> not portable across languages, and not easily machine-readable.
>>
>> Of course, doing all these things would require major, major changes in
>> how
>> Wikipedia's software works. Developers would have to write a lot of code
>> and editors would have to get used to new things. But sometimes it's worth
>> thinking our of the box instead of saying "that's not how Wikipedia
>> works".
>>
>> בתאריך שבת, 9 בפבר׳ 2019, 02:16, מאת Aaron Gray <
>> aaronngray.li...@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>> > I am suggesting WikiPedia has context-sensitive articles so if you are a
>> > kid or a layperson or an expert in a field you get a different
>> > introduction.
>> >
>> > Often the reason people don't read or use WikiPedia is articles are too
>> > complex at the start.
>> >
>> > Having an adaptive setting that can be chosen but users as default needs
>> > facilitating by WikiMedia technology.
>> >
>> > Thoughts and ideas and possible implementation ideas on this idea are
>> > welcomed.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Aaron
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Aaron Gray
>> >
>> > Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
>> > Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wiki-research-l mailing list
>> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>>
>
>
> --
> Aaron Gray
>
> Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
> Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
>


-- 
Aaron Gray

Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to