Why were we even talking about stewards overruling local admins? I don't see that suggested in any of the emails above, and obviously it would be totally inappropriate.
But on the whole I agree, Vito. There are more productive ways of dealing with this. Adrian Raddatz On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > On 6 August 2016 at 07:42, Yaroslav M. Blanter <pute...@mccme.ru> wrote: > > > Andy Mabbett писал 2016-08-04 22:45: > >> > >> On 1 August 2016 at 01:05, Vi to <vituzzu.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> There is no community action to overrule. The deletion was done by > >> single, involved admin, with no discussion, and without any backing in > >> policy. > > > > > > Really? > > Really, You're welcome to provide evidence to the contrary (note: > that's "evidence", not "assertion".) > > > And we, the admin cabal, just massively disregard policies? > > Who said anything about a cabal? > > > May be you should learn to listen at some point. You have been provided > with > > all necessary explanations, multiple times. > > Poppycock. > > > You may agree or disagree, but > > repeatedly stating there were no explanations is IDONOTHEARIT. > > Where have I stated that there were "no explanations"? Sadly, the very > few that have been offered have been easily refuted, both here and on > Wikidata's admin noticeboard, as they include logical fallacies, make > claims made with no evidence, do not address the concerns raised and > are not based in any policy. > > > Stop it. > > On the basis of your authority? > > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
