Slava, This sounds interesting I would be happy to be a test subject in the bio or semantic web domain.
(There is no reason this project needs to be reviewed by Wikimedia Research or anyone else. The data is open, please go ahead and use it to do useful research like this.) Whether or not any generated content actually moves into Wikidata is a completely different question. cheers -Ben On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Slava Sazonau <sazon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, absolutely. Apologies for being unclear: we consider each axiom as a > hypothesis that should be reviewed. This is indeed a jargon since logical > statements in OWL are usually called axioms (and in our case those > statements can be actually wrong since they are acquired from data > automatically). > > Slava > > On 25 October 2016 at 16:27, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> As far as I know, an axiom by definition can't be false. What definition >> are you using? Maybe some jargon specific to this research field? >> >> Nemo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
