> It's a machine with 378 GiB of RAM and 64 threads running Scientific > Linux 7.2, that we use mainly for benchmarks. > > Building the index was really all about memory because the CPUs have > actually a lower per-thread performance (2.30 GHz vs 3.5 GHz) compared > to those of my regular workstation, which was unable to build it.
If your regular workstation was using more CPU, I guess it was because of swapping. Thanks for the statistics, it means a "commodity" CPU could handle this fine, the bottleneck is RAM. I wonder how expensive it is to buy a machine like yours... it sounds like in the $30K-$50K range? > You're right. The limited query language of hdtSearch is closer to > grep than to SPARQL. > > Thank you for pointing out Fuseki, I'll have a look at it. I think a SPARQL command-line tool could exist, but AFAICT it doesn't exist (yet?). Anyway, I have already successfully setup Fuseki with a HDT backend, although my HDT files are all small. Feel free to drop me an email if you need any help setting up Fuseki. _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
