Wayne, Declan, Everyone... I like where all this discussion is going. The bit that I want to throw into all this is the use of Maturity Models. I like how they encourage continuous improvement, which I believe applies well to Wiki based OER. The "rating" a page / lesson / resource is based upon a maturity model that applies to the context the page / lesson / resource is available. This would then fit within what Declan was saying earlier about indices, where the maturity model could be implemented as a rubric (which they could be considered this anyhow) for the particular grade or subject... I also believe the use of rubrics would be familiar to the educational population we are working with.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Maturity_models Be Well... Peter On May 4, 7:52 pm, mackiwg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi to everyone watching the QA and review thread. > > We're looking for volunteers to assist with drafting a WE policy on QA > and review. > > If you're interested in helping out --- please add your name to the > list on the QA page on WE. > > http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_and_Review > > Hey Peter, you're pretty fast on the draw yourself -- I see you listed > your name before I had a chance to post the invite <smile>. Thanks! > > Cheers > Wayne --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To post to this group, send email to wikieducator@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
