Just +1 on the stfu.
Le 16 nov. 2015 7:53 AM, "Christophe Henner" <christophe.hen...@gmail.com>
a écrit :

> I'm sorry but just shut the fuck up about "religion".
>
> They're bloodlusty assholes that wanted to kill and divide. Nothing more.
>
> It's not a religious thing (Paris isn't à holy city) or a cultural thing.
> It's hate. Simple and plain hate.
>
> They'd like us to say it's about religion and culture. Because that jump
> starts the next sentence, it's us versus them where us has a better
> culture. And then to start discriminating in our own country.
>
> Because us vs them is the basis of any racist speech.
>
> So please stop making it about culture and religion. Or if you want to make
> it about culture, make it about the real culture they attacked : tolerance,
> understanding, love.
>
> That would the best answer we could make.
>
> Thanks
>
> PS: sorry for this email I don't usually send those but hey after that
> week-end I couldn't restrain myself
> Le 16 nov. 2015 7:24 AM, "Isaac David" <isacdaa...@isacdaavid.info> a
> écrit :
>
> > Le dim. 15 nov. 2015 à 23:06, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com
> >
> > a écrit :
> >
> >> Hoi,
> >> Your sarcasm is nothing but discrimination. You throw everybody who
> >> beliefs
> >> on one pile.
> >>
> >
> > I don't know how anyone could be more explicit on his treatment of the
> > problems of making an overt generalisation, yet you attack me personally
> on
> > the alleged grounds that I have accused all religious people of being
> > violent.
> >
> > Just as if a religion, any religion is needed for people to
> >> get off the rails. There are plenty of examples of that.
> >>
> >
> > I never said so. I don't think so. Jainism serves as a good example of
> how
> > faith-based beliefs may be completely harmless depending on what the
> claims
> > are. However, I do think  religion is one of the ways some people get off
> > the rails, and that this is a problem that goes largely underestimated
> and
> > unacknowledged, firstly because most people subscribe to a religion and
> > second because it is so easy to confuse the criticism of intolerance and
> > bigotry with actual intolerance and bigotry. But this is irrelevant as
> far
> > as my original reply to Gnangarra and Vandenberg are concerned because I
> > didn't even touch that point. All I said is that I find it extremely
> > dishonest to claim that these attacks had nothing to do with Islam,
> > whatever the extremism and interpretations of ISIS might be and however
> > disconnected and offensive their deeds might look like for the rest of
> > Muslims.
> >
> >
> > As to who is an actual Muslim and who understands the sunna and its
> >> interpretation particularly in the light of Daesh, they are two distinct
> >> questions.
> >> Any typical Muslim will leave the finer points to the scholars,
> >>
> >
> > "Leaving" sounds like a bad idea. What is so great about experts is that
> > they shortcut the access to wisdom, but they shouldn't be used as an
> excuse
> > to waive intellectual responsibility. Scholars disagree, scholars make
> > mistakes , and it will be up to the average person to evaluate the
> problem
> > at hand. Scholars seldom enroll into armed conflict, average people do.
> >
> > any typical Muslim will disagree with Daesh on many major points.
> >>
> >
> > I'm so glad they do and I would like to thank them for it, but this
> > doesn't change a bit the relationship of Islam as a many-stranded
> religion
> > and the attacks at Paris. On the other hand I'm not so comfortable that
> > said major points don't include things like intolerance for other faiths,
> > specially non-Abrahamic ones, death penalty for adultery, the imposition
> of
> > Sharia in Western judicial systems and other topics which are agreed upon
> > by big fractions of Muslims.[1]
> >
> > By the way, I have no special focus on your religion; it's part of the
> > subject of this thread.
> > Regards
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>        GerardM
> >>
> >> On 15 November 2015 at 23:09, Isaac David <isacdaa...@isacdaavid.info>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>  <sarcasm>
> >>>  Yes, because there are many nice self-avowed Jewish, Muslims,
> >>> Christians,
> >>>  etc. around the world. Therefore when some bad people do something
> >>> horrible
> >>>  in the name of their cultural and ideological identity it actually has
> >>>  nothing to do with the ideas themselves, it's always got to be some
> >>> other
> >>>  historical, social or psychological factor, otherwise we would be
> >>> linking
> >>>  bad guys with good guys.
> >>>  </sarcasm>
> >>>
> >>>  But who are you to decide who is an actual Muslim and who isn't?
> >>>
> >>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Le dim. 15 nov. 2015 à 15:47, John Mark Vandenberg <jay...@gmail.com>
> a
> >>>  écrit :
> >>>
> >>>  On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>   Not sure we should be making such  a link as the events in Paris are
> >>>>> not
> >>>>>   about Islam just as the actions of the women in Kentucky was not a
> >>>>>   reflection of Christianity. Paris is not the only place its
> >>>>>  unfortunately
> >>>>>   its not even the latest place to fall victim to ISIS.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   Wikimedia is a world wide community and the focus on Paris ignores
> >>>>> all
> >>>>>  our
> >>>>>   other communities who have over the last week, months. year or
> longer
> >>>>>  have
> >>>>>   been affected by acts of terrorism, I think we should exercise care
> >>>>>  when we
> >>>>>   adopt activities that elevate events or imply some guilt of
> >>>>> association
> >>>>>   immortalizing that as fact in a place like wikipedia
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>  Very much agree broadly with Gnangarra, especially about links with
> >>>> Islam.
> >>>>  The most positive and wiki way to respond is to ensure we're being
> >>>>  neutral, and that the reality of all attacks around the world are
> >>>>  being adequately and accurately recorded in a balanced manner from a
> >>>>  worldwide perspective.
> >>>>
> >>>>  However the attack on Paris is widely viewed as an escalation, not
> >>>>  because a citizen of one country is more valued than another, because
> >>>>  some places are more treasured by larger number of people of the
> >>>>  world, and also we're more shocked as we expect they are better
> >>>>  protected, and that creates an elevation of its own.
> >>>>
> >>>>  I appreciate the Signpost for very tastefully responding, in a
> measured
> >>>>  way.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-11-11/Gallery
> >>>>
> >>>>  --
> >>>>  John Vandenberg
> >>>>
> >>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>>  Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >>>>  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >>>>  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>>  Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >>>>  <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>>>
> >>>>  _______________________________________________
> >>>  Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >>>  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >>>  Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ,
> >>>  <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> >> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to