Hi Robert,
> > > > Simply highlighting the ~1 page of arguably controversial stuff in a 67 > > page document is also unlikely to be optimal, because it creates a biased > > and misleading impression of the whole document, and gives the impression > > (accurately or not) that one's main interest is stirring up controversy. > > > That's very dismissive of legitimate concerns. If something is of genuine > worry, how many pages should it take up before we are allowed to raise our > concerns about it? Where there's a genuine worry, I think it's much more likely to get a constructive response if the worry is expressed with understanding of the context. "Here are my five concerns about this document" is quite a different thing to read from "Most of this document seems pretty sensible. However, are five concerns I have about it, though I think I have only spotted one of them actually happening at all" Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
