Hoi, How about Portuguese from Africa? Thanks, GerardM On 27 July 2018 at 16:41, Paulo Santos Perneta <paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jane, > > Yes, maybe I have been lucky for having to deal with a Wikipedia that, > despite having its fair share of problems, actually has not that kind of > strife. We have 2 major linguistic varieties there (different to the point > that stuff in European Portuguese is often subtitled in Brazil), and I > can't remember the last time we had any problem related to that. We used to > have some episodic problems, but since we passed a rule around 2011 > declaring that articles directly related to a geographic region should use > the variety spoken in that geographic region, it ceased to be a problem. > Language/variety diversity is often seen there as a source of richness and > knowledge, and not as some kind of downside that people have to endure in > order to participate. > > Some people of wiki.pt are also very active at the Mirandese and Galician > wikis, projects with which we often engage in close collaboration. > > I'm also quite active at Commons, where we use mostly English, but a bit of > everything as well (many categories are written using 2 different > languages, for instance, and we often communicate in our native languages > over there, often in the same thread). > > I wouldn't doubt that there are some people that despise languages > different from the one they speak, but I don't believe it's anywhere "split > down the middle". At least that is not my experience, at all. > > > All the best, > > > Paulo > > > 2018-07-27 14:57 GMT+01:00 Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com>: > > > Well just speaking from my experience with the nlwiki community, there is > > often a tendency to e.g. delete Belgian versions of local folklore or > > cuisine, or merge these into Dutch local folklore or cuisine articles. I > > think in general, you could say that most mono-lingualists are fairly > > certain their country and by association, their language is the best, and > > any other speakers of their language should either conform or start their > > own wiki, never mind local grammar rules, etc. I am surprised you haven't > > come across this at all - consider yourself lucky! > > > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Paulo Santos Perneta < > > paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello Jane, > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that we are in fact > > split down the middle into parties that believe > > > "some languages are better than others" and "let's save all existing > > > languages on the planet, including all of their fonts ever used on- and > > > offline". > > > > > > I don't know why do you wrote this, as I never had this impression, at > > > all. We are split by languages since the Babel Tower was embargoed by > > God, > > > but I never, ever remember hearing someone saying or even hinting that > > > "some languages are better than others". > > > > > > All the best, > > > > > > Paulo > > > > > > > > > 2018-07-25 8:28 GMT+01:00 Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Hmm. Yes and no. Yes the May 2017 conference suffered from some > > > interesting > > > > selection bias, but no the people there were not all brainwashed into > > > > forgetting their "wildness". We are all still wild wild Wikipedians > at > > > > heart, speaking for the 2006 cohort in its entirety. I really doubt > > > whether > > > > the WMF is trying to shove us all in a direction of their choosing. > > > > > > > > I think > > > > that we are in fact split down the middle into parties that believe > > "some > > > > languages are better than others" and "let's save all existing > > languages > > > on > > > > the planet, including all of their fonts ever used on- and offline". > > Then > > > > there is a huge discrepancy in workflow for these people and the > folks > > > who > > > > work in just one language and never think of language as a movement > > topic > > > > at all. Among this monolingual crowd (many of whom do not subscribe > to > > > any > > > > mailing list or other communication outlets) are the overlapping > groups > > > > between the "field workers" and the "library workers". The field > > workers > > > > tend to operate more by a "drive-by" methodology, and the "library > > > workers" > > > > tend to operate more by a "step-by-step" methodology. I respectfully > > > submit > > > > that we have all dabbled in all of these worlds and therefore we all > > have > > > > enough common sense to shout "Whoa!" if something really really wrong > > > gets > > > > proposed. But in the past I have felt quite strongly that something > was > > > > really really wrong, but it turned out it was just a factor of me > being > > > > unaware of workflow difficulties experienced by others. So e.g. > > > personally > > > > I was against the idea of "protected pages" but have come around to > > > seeing > > > > they are useful - even on Wikidata. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:12 PM, Anders Wennersten < > > > > m...@anderswennersten.se> wrote: > > > > > > > > > As I see it the strategy process is run for the functionaries in > the > > > > > movement and by them. People with focus on contributing to the > > projects > > > > are > > > > > not involved, when volunteers is mentioned it is mostly people > > running > > > > > worskhops for beginners etc, a kind of semi functionaries, not the > > hard > > > > > core contributes. > > > > > > > > > > This could be a good thing and foster a new set of moment leaders, > > > fully > > > > > in agreement with goals and strategy. It could also be seen as a > > > > weakness, > > > > > as we do not recognize the more "wild" (but creative)y culture in > our > > > > > communities and only have the "nice" and obedient culture being > > > accepted. > > > > > > > > > > Facts > > > > > > > > > > The vision was really created in Wikiconf 2017 by functionaries > > > > > > > > > > The way forward was defined by Wikiconf 2017 by functionaries > > > > > > > > > > The set up of work groups was from the beginning set up to include > > > > (only) > > > > > functionaries (time requirement, and first it was also talked of > > > > candidates > > > > > should be endorsed by local chapters). And the actual selection was > > not > > > > > done transparent as is the culture of the communities but by "boss" > > > > > selection (I only feel the movement is starting to resemble a big > > > > company, > > > > > not the vibrant communities) > > > > > > > > > > Anders > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Den 2018-07-24 kl. 21:29, skrev Yaroslav Blanter: > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:16 PM, David Cuenca Tudela < > > > dacu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> I do not know what really happened but if I listen to what has > been > > > said > > > > >> here and earlier on similar occasions, my conclusion is that for > the > > > > >> Strategy Team we - volunteers who are working on the projects but > > are > > > > not > > > > >> associated with the chapters, do not show up at Wikimania, do not > > > attend > > > > >> real-life tutorials organized by WMF - just do not exist. > > > > >> > > > > >> If this is the case, this is a serious gap to be bridged. So far I > > > have > > > > >> net > > > > >> see even an acknowledgement of its existence. > > > > >> > > > > >> Cheers > > > > >> Yaroslav > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik > > > > >> i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik > > > > >> i/Wikimedia-l > > > > >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ > > mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > > > , > > > > >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject= > > unsubscribe> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wik > > > > > i/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ > > mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject= > unsubscribe> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/ > mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>