Wherever we host it, the most important thing seems to be geo-targeted notices. Where we host it doesn't actually matter, as long as we publicise the link well. On Jul 3, 2011 4:01 PM, "WereSpielChequers" <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd say that meta is the right place for meetup pages, but with > pubilicity from other projects that might be relevant. > > Holding it on Wikipedia might be seen as limiting it to Wikipedians. > > The drawback of inviting non-wikimedians is that they may not be > interested in wikimedia. So I'd suggest one should proceed with > caution there (that said I'm hoping that one of our GLAM contacts will > be at next Sunday's London meetup.. > > WSC > > On 2 July 2011 12:47, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2 July 2011 10:39, Tom Morris <t...@tommorris.org> wrote: >> >>> We should be getting more non-Wikipedia people involved and attending >>> events: because in-breeding isn't healthy. >> >> >> And more non-techies, for the same reason. >> >> >> - d. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> wikimediau...@wikimedia.org >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
