Thomas Dalton wrote: > On 30 January 2010 14:42, Chad <innocentkil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Whoops, haven't had any caffeine yet this morning, left the two links >> off here. They're: >> >> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/61083 >> > > Interestingly, the revision summary for that revision gives a link to > general browser stats, rather than Wikimedia browser stats, which are > obviously the relevant ones (although we have such high reach that > there isn't a large difference). We have stats from Nov 2009 > (http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportClients.htm) - > were those generated by a script that could be run again? Getting some > trends could help us work out when to ditch IE6. The recent > Google/China/IE story has received lots of coverage, including the > authorities in France and Germany advising people to ditch IE > entirely, so IE6 usage has probably shown a noticeable dip. > I read a note before that someone caught Microsoft's Bing making a number of requests to their site with a UA that makes it look like ie6 and inflates stats. http://opengameart.org/forumtopic/dear-microsoft
Are the stats setup to differentiate between real ie6 users and bing autosurfing? ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name] _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
