On 01/09/12 06:08, Daniel Kinzler wrote: > Until a few weeks ago, I let development on that branch rest, awaiting > feedback > so I could be sure to be moving into the right direction. This didn't work > out, > since the code was still too incomplete for a full review. I have now tied > down > most loose ends, but I'm still getting no feedback. Would it be best to halt > development again? It's never going to be *finished*, there's always > *something* > to improve...
I've been busy, but I can do another review of the ContentHandler branch this week. I'm not expecting to find major architectural issues with it. Architecturally, it's pretty simple: replace text with Content objects, and have a ContentHandler hierarchy representing their types. That basic scheme is not disputed. There's the question of what level of quality we should aim for. We'll probably find things that will break when a non-text content type is used. I'd like to see such issues solved, or at least make sure the ContentHandler API will support a solution without major changes, but my reasons are mostly aesthetic. In principle, such development work can be done after the merge. But it seems to me that there's no point in merging it if it only supports text content, since MediaWiki already supports pure text content well enough. If we can achieve robust support for non-text data types, then the motivation for merging it will be stronger. -- Tim Starling _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
