Agreed. I know that for my extensions, while I'm open to taking in co-maintainers who want to approve commits, I'd definitely not be comfortable just opening it to the public.
*--* *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2015 Major in Computer Science www.whizkidztech.com | tylerro...@gmail.com On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Sébastien Santoro <dereck...@espace-win.org > wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 7:09 PM, <vita...@yourcmc.ru> wrote: > >> Actually registration is open to everyone now by simple form > >> submission. So actually, any one developer could get any change they > >> wanted merged. All they need to do is trivially register a second > >> labs account. > > > > > > Okay, but current situation is also a problem, because with it reviewing > and > > merging takes much more time. > > And as I've said, I think most extensions aren't as important as the > core, > > and limitting approve for them to core developers is just a waste... > > > > Maybe you should add some group similar to previous (SVN) "commit access > to > > extensions", so a wider group of people could merge changes to the > > extensions? > > This would have to be limited to extension with authors/maintainers > opting in for your system. > > I'm not feel comfortable to enforce this practice on any extension. > > This situation could vary from one set of extensions to another. For > example, changes on the semantic ones are very quickly reviewed. > > -- > Best Regards, > Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson > http://www.dereckson.be/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
