On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:55 AM, K. Peachey <p858sn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Željko Filipin <zfili...@wikimedia.org> > wrote: > >> Most of these projects seem to be extension (and PHP?) centric. Can we > >> have more diversity? > > > > > > Browser test automation? Not an extension, not in PHP, but in Ruby[2]. > > OPs don't want [any more] ruby on the clusters, So I wouldn't suggest that. > > We should be focusing on stuff that is achievable and that can easily > be shown on benefit our users by actually getting it out there (we > have a shocking record for this) It's not on the cluster, we manage these in gerrit[0] and run these completely openly on a hosted service. https://wmf.ci.cloudbees.com/. This is after many long discussions with various ops folks over the past year. These tests consistently find regression problems[1], and this week alone found regression issues with PageTriage and GuidedTour. It is achieved, it is demonstrably of benefit, it is definitely out there. [0]https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/projects/qa/browsertests [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/QA/Browser_testing/Examples _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
