On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Tim Starling <tstarl...@wikimedia.org>wrote:
> My concern with this kind of maintainer model is that RFC review would > tend to be narrower -- a consensus of members of a single WMF team > rather than a consensus of all relevant experts. > I'd also like to point out that we can still implement a maintainer system without changing the RFC process. There's no requirement that RFC review and maintainers be the same people. This thread is mainly a discussion about "Architects" (or the concept thereof), and how we might want to change the MediaWiki code review structure. *-- * *Tyler Romeo* Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016 Major in Computer Science _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
