Jon,

1: Get templateeditor rights on your volunteer account, you can edit the 
majority of templates with that, and you only need to proof your skill with 
templates for that, which is a reasonably low barrier. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_editor
2: This whole stuff is mostly as far as it is going to get on en.wp without 
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Allow_styling_in_templates
What remains currently, even when consolidated and cleaned up, will still be 
thousands of lines of CSS, for what will only touch 1 % of the pages, so it has 
no business in Common.css, yet much of it requires media queries to really make 
a worthwhile improvement.
3: Whoever mentioned blockquotes… Just before I burned out on en.wp, I was 
working on 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Quotation_cleanup 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Quotation_cleanup>

There is indeed a lot of work to do there, they are a mess.

DJ
 

> On 8 okt. 2014, at 03:16, Jon Robson <jdlrob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7 Oct 2014 18:15, "Jon Robson" <jrob...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 7 Oct 2014 18:03, "Dan Garry" <dga...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Jon,
>>> 
>>> Regarding editing specific templates, I'll echo Brion here. If a
> template
>>> is causing difficulties for your work and you feel like you know enough
> to
>>> fix it, then fix it! That's the wiki way. If you don't have the rights
> to
>>> edit the template (e.g. because it's protected), then speak to Tomasz
> and
>>> he will try to get you the rights that you need.
>> Sure but this isn't scalable. I need more people caring about this stuff
> other than me :)
>> 
>> Also currently the only way to deal with these issues is to move styles
> into Common.CSS which only really makes sense for widely used templates...
> Ideally I'd want some kind of sanity checking rather than doing it live
> which seems to be the current status quo. Changing HTML /CSS/JavaScript
> [without any kind of review]
> always felt uncomfortable to me.
>> 
>>> Regarding the broader issue of the fact that there are thousands of
> these
>>> kinds of templates, I will also echo Brion! We need to make mobile
> testing
>>> more visible to those who are creating those templates.
>>> 
>>> Dan
>>> 
>>> On 7 October 2014 15:14, Brion Vibber <bvib...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jon Robson <jrob...@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On mobile we continuously get bugs related to inline styles in
>>>>> templates. For example:
>>>>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68001
>>>>> 
>>>>> When these happen we usually spend time investigating, discover it
> is
>>>>> because of a troublesome inline style in the template and then we
>>>>> communicate this on the template talk page [1]
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, rarely do these get replies and rarely does anything get
> fixed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am I doing something wrong? Should I be posting these problems
>>>>> elsewhere? It seems like a lot of templates do not have active
>>>>> maintainers.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The wiki way is not to ask and wait for someone else to act, but to
> act
>>>> directly in good faith and communicate what you did and why so that if
>>>> there is disagreement it can be resolved afterwards.
>>>> 
>>>> Ultimately if we're unwilling to help edit and maintain the content
> and
>>>> style of the wikis, we're going to be stuck working around bad styles
>>>> forever.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> There has been an RFC [2] open for ages that when solved I hope will
>>>>> lead to lots of discussions between developers and template
>>>>> maintainers but right now it seems even without the tools we are
>>>>> failing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> How can we get better at making our template styles more mobile
> friendly?
>>>>> 
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> 
>>>> 
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Allow_styling_in_templates
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to revitalize this one; I'll do some testing this weekend
> and put
>>>> it on the agenda for next week's RfC.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm also interested in some kind of easy "preview how this page will
> look
>>>> on mobile" in the editor, which would probably be a separate thing...
>>>> 
>>>> -- brion
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Dan Garry
>>> Associate Product Manager, Mobile Apps
>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikitech-l mailing list
>>> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to