In fact... On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Quim Gil <q...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > As the description of https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T18 says, The > Code Review migration to Phabricator is quite orthogonal to the RT and > Bugzilla migrations, and we should start planning for it now. We need to > request resources for the current quarter now, and in order to do this > properly we need to have an initial plan that gives us an idea of the > skills/roles needed and for how long. > After some discussions today, we have concluded that we have not enough resources to have a complete assessment (including a proof of concept) and a full fledged project plan by the end of 2014. The "stretch goal" proposed for the current quarter is a "Basic plan for Phabricator as code review tool". The exact content of this basic plan needs to be defined, but the main idea is to identify technical showstoppers and propose the next steps, keeping a stream of discussion and experimentation. More: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T18#12479 _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
