On Jan 16, 2015 11:07 AM, "Brad Jorsch (Anomie)" <bjor...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
>
> > However, with clear API architecture we could maybe have
> > alternatives - i.e. be able to have the same service performed by a
> > superpowered cluster or by a PHP implementation on the URL on the same
> > host.
>
>
> The problem there is that the PHP implementation is likely to code-rot,
> unless we create really good unit tests that actually run for it.
>
> It would be less bad if the focus were on librarization and daemonization
> (and improvement) of the existing PHP code so both methods could share a
> majority of the code base, rather than rewriting things from scratch in an
> entirely different language.
>
> and maybe reduced feature set.
>
>
> That becomes a hazard when other stuff starts to depend on the non-reduced
> feature set.
>
>
> --
> Brad Jorsch (Anomie)
> Software Engineer
> Wikimedia Foundation
>

I like this approach. After all it worked well enough for image
thumbnailing and job queue.

Writing things in different languages just reminds me of what a mess math
support used to be.

--bawolff
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to